Thread: SSH security with -D and tunneling
so, i've been reading around , came across post
http://superuser.com/questions/62303...ic-through-ssh
couple posts down, claims tunneling through ssh -d not 100% secure? there wasn't more discussion on why not.
statement correct? if i'm in public wifi setting , i'm tunneling
is enough? or should concerned security.code:ssh -d 9999 -c me@myhost.com
under impression goes through ssh encrypted time. missing something?
(i know other post talking doing traffic, i'm interested in ssh -d port forwarding/socks stuff). thanks!
according http://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?storyid=1603
[paraphrase]
web surfing encrypted home box before traveling internet [using ssh]. recent browsers send outbound dns request through ssh tunnel. advised outbound dns requests still sent local network unencrypted [if you're on public wifi , using socks]. reason use squid if concerned privacy or being re-directed malicious dns servers on wireless lan.
[/paraphrase]
Forum The Ubuntu Forum Community Ubuntu Specialised Support Security [SOLVED] SSH security with -D and tunneling
Ubuntu
Comments
Post a Comment